AI in executive reports: a good proposal faster, with the weighing left to the executive

By · Updated · 3 min read

Short answer

An executive report has a fixed structure: background, recommendations, arguments, risks, finance, legal check, communication. Officers write them weekly, often from a thick file. AI can summarise the file, produce a first draft in the template, prepare the checks and test consistency with earlier policy. The advice, the weighing and the decision stay with the officer, the executive and the council. Every statement in the report refers to its source.

The process

The executive of a local authority decides weekly on dozens of proposals: from a grant award to a council report on the budget. Each proposal follows the same route: author, team leader, finance, legal, sometimes communications and the chief executive, then the executive. Some go on to the council with a council report and a draft resolution.

The work is in the file: earlier decisions, policy, legislation, advice, letters from stakeholders. A good report summarises that, weighs it and reaches advice the executive can grasp in a quarter of an hour.

Where AI helps

PartWhat AI doesWhat the officer does
FileSummarises earlier decisions, policy and advice with source referencesDecides what is relevant
DraftFirst version in the template, with the fixed parts filled from the fileWrites the advice and the weighing
ChecksFlags the financial cover, the legal basis and the overlaps with other policyFinance and legal carry out the checks
ConsistencyCompares with earlier executive decisions on the same subjectExplains departures
Council reportConverts the executive report into the council format and a draft resolutionClerks and portfolio holder review

See Summarising confidential documents with AI and AI for the council and its clerks for the next step in the council.

Where it goes wrong

  • A report that reads too well. A language model writes persuasively, even when the substantiation is thin. The risks section is the most important part; have AI prepare precisely that in depth.
  • Invented decisions. “The executive decided in 2023…” must come from the decisions register, not from the model. Source references are mandatory.
  • Confidentiality. Reports are confidential until the executive has decided, and sometimes afterwards. They do not belong in a public tool.
  • Records and access to information. Draft versions and the AI output used are part of the file and can be requested. See Archiving AI outputs.
  • Responsibility. The officer signs for the report and the executive for the decision. AI sits in the process, not in the signature.

How werqly fits in

With werqly the organisation has the decisions register, policy and templates as sources on a dedicated node, with a role per department and confidential files only for those allowed to see them. The audit log shows per report which sources were used, which is directly usable for an access-to-information request or a council question. See AI for local government.

Frequently asked questions

Questions on this topic

May an executive report be written with AI?

A draft, yes, if the officer writes the advice and the weighing, every statement has a source and the report is produced in an environment of the authority. The officer and the executive remain responsible.

Must the report state that AI was used?

Not a legal duty, but sensible as a fixed part of the process: which steps were done with AI and who checked them. It helps with access-to-information requests and questions from the council.

Can AI do the financial and legal checks?

AI can flag the cover and the legal basis and prepare them. The check itself stays with finance and legal; they sign for it.

What happens to the draft versions?

They are part of the file under records law and can be requested under freedom-of-information rules. Keep them according to the retention schedule and make sure the AI output is traceable.

Sources

  1. Dutch Municipalities Act (Gemeentewet)
  2. Dutch General Administrative Law Act, Section 3.7 (reasoning)

This article is general information, not legal advice. Rules and guidance change; check the sources listed or ask your lawyer or DPO if in doubt.

About the author

Tim Hoogstrate

Founder of werqly

Tim Hoogstrate is a software developer and the founder of werqly. He writes the articles in the knowledge base: what the GDPR, the AI Act and sector rules require when you use AI, and how to arrange that in an environment of your own.

Calculate your private AI costs.

Enter your work email and number of employees. We work out four setups for you straight away: in your own server room or in our datacentre, self-managed or with werqly Pro management. werqly is not a cheap AI subscription: you pay for your own hardware and full control.

  1. 1Enter your email and number of employees
  2. 2Compare four proposals
  3. 3Request a quote straight away

We email the calculation to this address and use it only to contact you about your request.

A no-obligation quote for your own AI node, in your inbox within a minute.

Request a quote →