AI literacy in local government: who needs to know what, from council to front desk

By · Updated · 3 min read

Short answer

Article 4 of the AI Act asks organisations to take measures that support the AI literacy of their staff; after the Digital Omnibus without a prescribed level, but still as a duty. For a public body one generic training is too little: a councillor needs to look at AI differently from a case worker in social services or a contact centre employee. Make a plan per role, short and practical, tied to the applications that role actually uses.

What the duty involves

Providers and deployers of AI systems take measures to ensure their staff are sufficiently AI-literate, taking into account their knowledge, the context and the people the AI is applied to. No certificate or number of hours is prescribed. You must be able to show what you did. See AI literacy for the general explanation and The EU AI Act in 2026.

A different story per role

RoleWhat they need to knowForm
CouncilWhich questions to ask about AI proposals: purpose, data, fundamental rights, registerOne council evening per term, plus a checklist
Executive and managementResponsibility, risk classes, what national policy asksHalf a day with the authority’s own applications as cases
Social servicesWhere high risk begins, what is allowed, how to contradict an outcomeOne-hour team session, repeated for new applications
Contact centre and deskWhat the assistant does and does not know, when to refer, transparency to residentsPractical training with real questions
Lawyers and DPOAI Act, GDPR, information law and records together; DPIA and rights assessmentIn-depth, external or through the association of municipalities
IT and securityModels, connections, permissions, logging, prompt injectionTechnical training on the authority’s own environment
EveryoneWhat to enter and what not, how to recognise and report a wrong answerHalf an hour, mandatory, with the internal policy

An approach that sticks

  1. Tie training to use. Whoever gets an assistant gets the training with it, when the application becomes available. See Rolling out an AI assistant.
  2. Use your own examples. A wrong answer about your own by-law teaches more than a general explanation of language models.
  3. Make reporting mistakes easy. One reporting point, and show what happens with reports.
  4. Record who followed what. That is your evidence for the AI Act duty, and it tells you who needs a top-up when a new application arrives.
  5. Repeat on change. A new model or a new automation is a moment for a short refresher.

How werqly fits in

An environment of your own makes training concrete: staff practise with the assistant they actually use, on their own department’s sources. werqly AI Control shows per role which models and sources are available, and the audit log shows where mistakes and corrections arise in practice; that is the best input for the next training round. See AI for local government.

Frequently asked questions

Questions on this topic

Is AI training mandatory for civil servants?

The AI Act asks organisations that deploy AI to take measures that support their staff’s AI literacy. No level or number of hours is prescribed, but you must be able to show what you did, matched to the role and the application.

Should the council be trained as well?

The duty is aimed at the organisation, but the council decides on AI proposals and scrutinises the executive. A council evening on the questions that belong with every AI proposal, purpose, data, fundamental rights and register, is a sensible investment.

What is the minimum for everyone?

What to enter and what not, how to recognise a wrong answer and where to report it, plus the internal AI policy. Half an hour, mandatory, and repeated as soon as a new application arrives.

How do we show we meet the duty?

Record per role which training was offered, who followed it and when, linked to the applications in your AI register. That overview is what a supervisor or the council wants to see.

Sources

  1. Artificialintelligenceact.eu — Article 4: AI literacy
  2. Government of the Netherlands — Government broadens position on generative AI (April 2025, Dutch)

This article is general information, not legal advice. Rules and guidance change; check the sources listed or ask your lawyer or DPO if in doubt.

About the author

Tim Hoogstrate

Founder of werqly

Tim Hoogstrate is a software developer and the founder of werqly. He writes the articles in the knowledge base: what the GDPR, the AI Act and sector rules require when you use AI, and how to arrange that in an environment of your own.

Calculate your private AI costs.

Enter your work email and number of employees. We work out four setups for you straight away: in your own server room or in our datacentre, self-managed or with werqly Pro management. werqly is not a cheap AI subscription: you pay for your own hardware and full control.

  1. 1Enter your email and number of employees
  2. 2Compare four proposals
  3. 3Request a quote straight away

We email the calculation to this address and use it only to contact you about your request.

A no-obligation quote for your own AI node, in your inbox within a minute.

Request a quote →